Table or Graph?


The side by side illustrations below show the same information, first in table form and then in graphical form. While the information in the table is precise, the real goal is to compare a series of clinical outcomes in subjects taking either a drug or a placebo. The graphical presentation on the right makes it possible to quickly see that for each of the outcomes evaluated, the drug produced relief in a great proportion of subjects. Moreover, the viewer gets a clear sense of the magnitude of improvement, and the error bars provided a sense of the uncertainty in the data.

Source: Connor JT.  Statistical Graphics in AJG:  Save the Ink for the Information.  Am J of Gastroenterology. 2009; 104:1624-1630.

Principles for Table Display

Consider the data in the table below from http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/commoncancers

 

Type

Incidence

Proportion

Bladder

72,570

5.7%

Breast

232,340

18.2%

Colon

142,820

11.2%

Kidney

59,938

4.7%

Leukemia

48,610

3.8%

Lung

228,190

17.9%

Melanoma

76,690

6.0%

Lymphoma

69,740

5.5%

Pancreas

45,220

3.5%

Prostate

238,590

18.7%

Thyroid

60,220

4.7%

Our ability to quickly understand the relative frequency of these cancers is hampered by presenting them in alphabetical order. It is much easier for the reader to grasp the relative frequency by listing them from most frequent to least frequent as in the next table.

Type

Incidence

Proportion

Prostate

238,590

18.7%

Breast

232,340

18.2%

Lung

228,340

17.9%

Colon

142,820

11.2%

Melanoma

76,690

6.0%

Bladder

72,570

5.7%

Lymphoma

69,740

5.5%

Thyroid

60,220

4.7%

Kidney

59,938

4.7%

Leukemia

48,610

3.8%

Pancreas

45,220

3.5%

However, the same information might be presented more effectively with a dot plot, as shown below.

Data from http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/commoncancers